Home Latest News SORS Blog Historic Legal Decision Threatens Alcan's Private Power Sales
Increase Font Size   Decrease Font Size
Why Run of River is no solution
Historic Legal Decision Threatens Alcan's Private Power Sales PDF Print E-mail
Written by Rafe Mair   
Tuesday, 24 February 2009 20:09

The history of Alcan and the city of Kitimat it spawned has been, to put it mildly, spotted. The idea behind the original massive environmental disaster was to allow Alcan to reverse rivers, build lakes, install pipes and generators, construct dams, and run roughshod over the rights of First Nations in order to supply electricity to its new aluminum smelter and the “vicinity of the works” (if they had any left over after their aluminum smelting needs were met). The original agreement as enshrined in legislation was for an aluminum smelter, not a power company.

Kemano-Kitimat power lineOver the years, in cahoots with the provincial government, Alcan did in fact become a power company - a big one - and its interest in smelting faded as the power dollars rolled in.

When I was part of the large group fighting Kemano II back in the 90s Alcan promised that this power was going to fuel a new smelter as well as the one in Kitimat … or was it two new smelters? Or perhaps four? It was difficult to keep count. As the struggle continued I was under considerable pressure from Kitimat and elsewhere to butt out - that Alcan was their buddy and would always keep its workers and their families close to their warm heart. The City Council of Terrace, which would have supplied much of the labour and equipment for Kemano II, passed a resolution declaring Terrace to be a “Rafe Mair free zone.”

One morning I interviewed Bill Rich, an Alcan VP who was quarterbacking Kemano II, and I got this usually taciturn executive to pound his fist on the table and say “you don’t seem to understand that Alcan is not in the Aluminum business … it’s in the power business!” In anger, veritas!

To cut to the chase, it began to dawn on the people of Kitimat that the smelter was shutting down lines, that Alcan was neglecting maintenance and modernization. And where were all those new smelters?

In 2002 The Kitimat Council reluctantly concluded:

1. Alcan is now in a position whereby it would be contrary to shareholder value for the firm to invest in aluminum in BC.
2. It is contrary to Alcan’s shareholder value to remain in aluminum production in BC.
3. Alcan will therefore minimize aluminum production in BC and maximize power.

So Kitimat, reading the original agreement and legislation, went to court maintaining, quite reasonably, that Alcan was doing much more than creating power for “the works and the vicinity” and that victory was a slam dunk.

Ah, but you see, these things can get a bit tricky. Alcan and the government of BC said that the only people that can have “standing” to sue on a contract are those who made that contract, namely the province and Alcan. In short, since the province of BC was into this skullduggery up to its eyeballs it wasn’t going to sue - so tough titty, Kitimat!

Kitimat got some solace from a 2006 decision of the BC Utilities Commission which found that a $2 billion "sweetheart" deal between B.C. Hydro and Alcan - where Alcan could generate power for $5 a megawatt hour, and sell it to BC Hydro (that’s us folks) for $71 - was just a bit too sweet.  Revelations amid the proceedings that Gordon Campbell owned Alcan stock may also have helped to torpedo that deal.  So Alcan and Hydro tried again and in 2007 did another “not quite so sweet a deal" - this one approved by the BCUC.  But trouble was lurking in the form of men and women in black robes and a very persistent First Nation...

As mentioned, the Carrier Sekani First Nation had been screwed at every turn by Alcan which, back in the 50s, flooded its land including their graveyards using agreements that Elders of that day who, not speaking English, signed with Xs, it being later determined that the Xs were all done by one man, probably the Indian agent.

Alcan Kitimat SmelterWell, last week the Carrier Sekani won and won big in the BC Court of Appeal, which held there was "massive" infringement” of the right of the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council to be consulted in the Kemano Power Project and later expansion near Kitimat that involves B.C. Hydro buying electricity from the Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. aluminum smelter. The court also found "B.C. Hydro, as a Crown corporation, was taking commercial advantage of an assumed infringement on a massive scale, without consultation."

Wow! What does this mean? Is the entire Kitimat deal back to 1950 up for review? That claim, opened up and fairly decided could wipe out Rio Tinto who owns Alcan now and has a lot of other financial unpleasantness on its hands – to say nothing of what could happen to taxpayers...  

What does that do to that “not quite so sweet” deal between Alcan and BC Hydro (remember, that’s us folks)?

The case will, no doubt, go to the Supreme Court of Canada but, as you may have noticed, First Nations are doing rather well in that august body these days.

What does this mean for Campbell’s energy and rivers giveaway to private interests without any consultation with the voting public? What does it mean for license applications and for license holders? Hard to say.

What is for sure is that the Campbell Government has concocted a huge screw up which will likely cost the taxpayers billions, demonstrating that the Liberal/Alcan lovey dovey relationship which resulted both in the above court case and Campbell’s energy giveaway plan - which was for all intents and purposes written by Alcan and other major private power players - together are such a horrendous calamity that all the evils of other governments past pale into insignificance.

Surely the voters of this province will deal appropriately with this wicked regime at the ballot box on May 12th next.


Add as favourites (217) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 2543

Comments (4)
RSS comments
1. 25-02-2009 05:16
 
The NDP and Kemano
If I recall correctly, it was the NDP that issued Kemano (Alcan) water licence for perpetuity in 1997. 
 
If the NDP had not done that, then it would have been possible to negotiate with Alcan for lower ratepayer prices. 
 
So why is Rafe trying to get NDP back in power?
Guest
 
Julian Laris
2. 01-03-2009 06:53
 
Controversial Alcan power project in Ice
Greetings! 
Iceland is having its own contoversial large power project being or has being built by Alcan. This project is taking large glacial rivers and damming or diverting them to create power (sound famialiar?) When I visited there in 2006, people that enjoyed the outdoors could see the potential enveronmental impacts. Glacial rivers are laden with lots of sediments that when suddenly slowed down, by dams, will just fill up the associated lakes and like "run of the river" also only generate power at specific times of the year.  
It sounds like large companies can alter our environment forever in the quest to satisfy the shareholders, with the people living in the nearby affected locations having to live with the consequences and few benefits.
Guest
 
3. 17-03-2009 16:44
 
Green Party Candidate
So with Gordon Campbell owning Alcan stock why wasn't some one calling conflict of interest and for his resignation.
Guest
 
4. 09-12-2009 17:53
 
Green Party Candidate
All I can see regardless of the out comes in the courts is the fact that we, the working tax payers, will pay the price with $$$$$ in the Billions either to the Indians of BC with their "special" status or to the power corporations including our very own little dictator in Victoria, so why give a damn. In the end we tax payers will just pay the price. 
Without prejudise, can all others say the same!
Guest
 

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6
AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com
All right reserved

   

facebookgroup

Click here to view Google Earth map
Jack Woodward interview
NAFTA and Our Rivers

Latest Comments

Seven disingenuous statements ...
I thought I heard that. Campbell had bribed the Haisla Band...
14/12/09 11:37 More...
By Cindy

Historic Legal Decision Threat...
All I can see regardless of the out comes in the courts is t...
09/12/09 17:53 More...
By Dogfish

It's All Going to the US
I have the feeling, that Canada, the US and Mexico will be o...
21/10/09 04:23 More...
By Sharon

Coming Together on Fish Farms ...
WATER - Plain and Simple
I wish you and others Rafe would also join the dots together...
01/09/09 03:12 More...
By June Ross

It's All Going to the US
I hope CALIFORNIA will boycott buying any electricity from B...
21/08/09 10:43 More...
By john prentice